tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7010274887320401335.post2841974133560967722..comments2023-08-26T06:35:23.920-07:00Comments on StaTEAstics.: Why multiple imputation?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17074814198177240918noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7010274887320401335.post-50778246110013931732014-03-24T05:40:49.150-07:002014-03-24T05:40:49.150-07:00I have updated the code, the columne "areaCod...I have updated the code, the columne "areaCode", and "unsdSubReg" were in my original analysis but not anymore.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17074814198177240918noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7010274887320401335.post-62242371544920646532014-03-23T04:36:38.750-07:002014-03-23T04:36:38.750-07:00I am using mi (Version 0.09-18.03, built: 2013-8-2...I am using mi (Version 0.09-18.03, built: 2013-8-22).<br /><br />This works :<br />> info = mi.info(romaniaMaize.df)<br /><br />But after that:<br />> info = mi.info.update.include(info,<br />+ list(areaCode = FALSE, unsdSubReg = FALSE, production = FALSE,<br />+ year = TRUE))<br />Error in object[[jj]]$imp.formula :<br /> $ operator is invalid for atomic vectors<br />Ajay Shahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03835842741008200034noreply@blogger.com